
The faults of the two brethren being so opposite, growth in grace would naturally assume two opposite forms in their respective experiences. In Peter it would take the form of concentration; in John, of expansion. Peter would become less charitable; John would become more charitable. Peter would advance from indiscriminate goodwill to a moral decidedness which should distinguish between friends and foes, the Church and the world; John's progress, on the other hand, would consist in ceasing to be a bigot and in becoming imbued with the genial, humane, sympathetic spirit of his Lord. Peter, in his mature state, would care much less for the opinions and feelings of men than he did at the present time; John again would care much more.
~A.B.Bruce, The Training of the Twelve, p474
2 comments:
Excellent post. I think it's easy to assume that sanctification is a cookie-cutter process, sort of a mass-manufactoring of the saints. But there will be differences, and the various strengths all have their place. (i.e. I Cor. 12)
I think it also reinforces the need for Christian community. (Not that Biblical commands need reinforcement, of course.) We all bring something different into the mix, and even the "opposite" personalities can help each other grow.
Excellent indeed. Bruce's book is a timeless sane, Biblical alternative to much of what is taught on 'leadership' today.
Post a Comment